REFLECTION #3

Over the last three weeks, my group and I have had the opportunity to have some very helpful discussions with our mentor, Andrew, which greatly influenced our project. We devised some key questions that needed to be resolved in order for us to progress with developing our QR code initiative. These questions focused on the design, accessibility, and the content of the project, thus giving clarity on how we should approach the next steps.

One of the first things discussed was the design process for the QR codes. Since we intend to involve QR codes in the project, we were seeking advice from Andrew on how to begin the design phase. We wanted to know the crucial steps we should make in order to get functional, visually appealing, and effectively integrated QR codes with the overall narrative.

In addition to design, we explored which documents would be most crucial to include in the project. We specifically discussed primary historical resources such as bills of sale and foundational documents dating back to 1828. These documents, we noted, are key to understanding the historical context of the Marry Mechium NPS and will form the backbone of the content. Andrew reiterated how significant it is to choose the right documents in order for the story to come across in a desirable and effective manner.

Access to these documents became another central point of discussion. We inquired about the level of access we would have to these valuable historical records—whether we would be able to view them online, as well as whether we could examine the original materials in person. Understanding the logistics of accessing these documents is crucial for planning how the QR codes will link to the appropriate resources.

The second important factor was the platform or website where we will host the QR codes. We wanted to learn what kind of website will support the project and make it easier for people to access digital content. We also passed the idea of reproducing physical copies of the documents onto the on-site display with the understanding that perhaps not all visitors could have smartphones or any kind of digital device that could open the link provided in the QR code. Andrew pointed out that, similar to how physical reproductions are used in the Underground Railroad exhibit at TG House, it would be feasible to create copies of the documents for public viewing without causing damage to the originals.

As we delved deeper into the project, we considered how much content should be embedded in the QR codes. We wanted to make sure each code is informative yet not too much for the visitors to comprehend within a short period of time. We talked about how we have to balance between giving enough context and not having too much information and making it too inaccessible. Andrew emphasized how an outline will keep it succinct yet adequate to provide a clear narrative.

One big challenge we grappled with was how to present this content without framing it as a type of “scavenger hunt.” We want it to be an entertaining and educational experience, but not necessarily a game. We want the takeaway to be meaningful from this for the visitor to make connections with the history of MOBOT and the surrounding community. As an institution trying to go ahead, we need to relook at how we would like to tell that story in a manner most palatable to today’s audience.

Another theme of discussion was signage. We explored ways to embed relevant content into the physical displays, paying mind to both the narrative flow and practical aspects that would be involved in installation. It will be interesting to see the final product marry these digital and physical elements together. Andrew mentioned that an important aspect of this final presentation would be MOBOT’s acknowledgement of SIUE’s contributions.

One evening, for instance, Andrew suggested adding “then and now” features to allow visitors to better grasp how things had changed over time. This was a very well-received idea, so we brainstormed the concept further. It was clear it could be a much-needed framing for the historical narrative. We reached consensus that the information should be contextualized in chronological order to take the visitor through the events in a logical and cohesive manner.

Last but not least, we reflected on specific documents from history that sometimes give a great insight into the life of the 1800s. For instance, this could be the letter that Shaw wrote to his mother when Missouri became a slave state. That was a very touching, firsthand account about personal experiences during that period. We agreed that this would be a very important piece to highlight in the project.

In the process, our continued discussions with Andrew have helped us revisit and fine-tune our approach, and we are clearer about how to go ahead. Now, we feel better prepared to make various decisions regarding content, design, and accessibility and look forward to further developing a project that will educate, engage, and leave a lasting impression on visitors. Upcoming steps will be the finalization of our content strategy, access to the relevant documents, and decisions on the best way to present this history in a manner honoring both the past and the present.