The person I interviewed happened to be a friend of mine, at first it was kind of awkward being so formal with them when our relationship consists of more casual conversations. Once the interview had a nice flow, I began to feel more comfortable and less awkward. My group formulated two questions that focused on how much time the interviewee devotes their time to studying “science-based subjects” over “history-based subjects”, I believe this question could’ve been asked differently. Making this question less focused on particular subjects could have allowed the interviewee to feel more pressured to think only about history-based and or science-based subjects they study. Depending on the interviewee’s major and schedule they may or may not take or study for either of these subjects. When crafting questions I thoroughly analyzed our quantitative data to come up with questions that I thought provided complementing qualitative data that created a deeper understanding of our numerical data. Previously, in my Human Communications and Disorders class, I interviewed a family member whose son has a speech disorder. For that interview, I just had an audio recording of their responses along with the questions I asked and referred back to them in the essay I wrote. With my partial experience in transcription, this experience wasn’t that much different. I often replayed or paused the audio recording after so many words and or sentences for better accuracy of what my interviewee was saying. I did notice that during the transcribing experience, I began to formulate further questions about their responses that are both related and non-related to studying habits.