Not all research studies can collect their evidence from modern sources. Many of them require evidence from historical sources, or archives. One of the best examples of researchers pulling information from archives comes from an article titled “City of Water: Port-au-Prince, Inequality, and the Social Meaning of Rain”.
The author of this article, Claire Antone Payton, clearly understands how crucial bias is when looking into historical events. For example, she includes accounts from Haitian residents such as Diefe Ofe. This ensures that her study reflects the real-life experiences of the people of Haiti instead of reflecting records provided by the elites in their society.
Oftentimes, pieces of a story are left out of records or archives in order to favor the perspectives of the elites. This is known as archival silence, or gatekeeping, which can alter the way we see history if the truth is never revealed. When information is hidden from researchers, it can lead to them providing false or inaccurate data to the public. On the other hand, the researchers could hold out on releasing the results of their studies if they are aware that missing data is out there, but that does not always happen.
If I were to use archives in my research on water equity issues, I would most likely try to find sources on the history of the Mississippi River. However, this task would end up proving rather difficult the further I search. Since much of the history of the Mississippi revolves around Native American tribes, finding more information on that topic would be challenging.
Performing archival research is not as easy as one might think. There are several obstacles that a researcher must overcome in order to do it right. Fortunately, the results are often worth the challenges.