Author: jdeboe (Page 2 of 4)

Dataset Review Worksheet

This article mainly focuses on the average person’s satisfaction with life. With that being said, the sample used in the study consisted of people of random ages, races, and years of education. In the end, the main survey topics discussed were self-esteem, private regard, sexual identification, satisfaction with life, and sex role inventory. Each topic received an average of “Agrees” and “Strongly Agrees”, showing that most of the participants of the study were living fulfilling lives. Even the graphs represent this trend well by showing a Bell curve. However, that does not mean that the study was not without its faults. 

It is true that the statistics in the article were rather precise, with the calculated means and standard deviations all being shown to the 4th decimal place. Despite this, the study does not exactly give the reader anything to think or reflect on. There is no major importance to this study. Since it is not being compared to past studies or studies from different countries, there is not much to take in at the end, other than most people in this country are satisfied with their lives. Along with that, the majority of the participants in this study were white college graduates in their 20s, which somewhat skews the results. The outlook on life of a white person in their 20’s is going to differ from an African American in their 50’s, or a white person who did not go to college. 

Lined up next to other research studies I have encountered in the past, it looks pretty similar, only simpler. The precision and structure of the data match many other studies on similar topics. Although, it was not exactly what I had expected, based on prior research. In the past few years, I have been led to believe that the self-esteem of the average person in the US has been slowly declining. While these two events could still be true, it makes me wonder what the self-esteem of the average person was in the past. Regardless of these conflicts, this study will still be useful in the future for comparing outlooks on life from different years. 

Article Annotation #1

If you asked the average person 10 years ago what they thought about artificial intelligence, most people would either immediately think about the robots from the Terminator or not understand what artificial intelligence actually is. By definition, artificial intelligence is the capacity of a computer program to execute functions that are normally related to human intelligence. In recent years, artificial intelligence programs like ChatGPT have become very popular as programmers are racing to improve the effectiveness of AI. This has also sparked a lot of debate about when and where AI should be properly used, like in school, for example. Luckily, many researchers have began to look into issues revolving around AI. An article titled “ChatGPT Goes to College” does a great job at showing just how far along we are on the path tp full AI integration. 

This study on ChatGPT was originally conducted in order to understand students’ views on artificial intelligence and its usefulness. The team created a survey that asked various questions such as how often they use ChatGPT in a school setting. Over 700 college students were asked these questions. In the end, the results showed that the introduction of ChatGPT did not directly cause the number of “cheaters” to increase, it merely allowed students who already had no problem with cheating to get assignments done in a crunch. This clearly shows that AI is not at the point where it is a concern for all students, as 54% of the students interviewed claimed that they have not yet used ChatGPT for school assignments. 

One of my first thoughts on the article was that it did a great job at making sure the results were not up for interpretation. The questions asked made sure to include several factors for the study, such as usage, reasoning, and effectiveness of usage. While this article did not end the debate on AI usage in school, it showed that there is still time to guide students on using artificial intelligence programs such as ChatGPT. The only problem with this study is that it was not widespread enough to show how true those results are for the rest of the country. 

The end of the study did catch me off guard at first. I have not done much research in regard to artificial intelligence in school, but even back in my senior year of high school, I began hearing several of my classmates talk about using AI to complete their assignments. These were also students who would not normally cheat in class. I would have expected the number of people who are comfortable with cheating to rise after ChatGPT. Now, these results may not be totally accurate compared to the rest of America, since the study had a few limitations to it, but I believe the study’s future implications are more important. We are at a time now when AI is still new, and not all students are using it in their everyday lives. This is the perfect opportunity for teachers to educate students on proper usage of artificial intelligence before it is too late. 

Works Cited 

Cavazos, Jenel T., et al. “ChatGPT Goes to College: Exploring Student Perspectives on Artificial Intelligence in the Classroom.” Teaching of Psychology, vol. 1, 7 Aug. 2024, www.researchgate.net/publication/382936523_ChatGPT_Goes_to_College_Exploring_Student_Perspectives_on_Artificial_Intelligence_in_the_Classroom, https://doi.org/10.1177/00986283241268829

Chapter 11 Top 5 Assignment

  1. It is interesting to think that making research a “solo journey” can drastically impact the results of the study. Conducting a study alone is not uncommon, but when it comes to multi-layered issues, it turns out working with a team can actually benefit the way in which the research is done. 
  1. I believe the effects of ethnic diversity on community connections could go both ways. A similar ethnic population could lead to the people feeling like they all have something in common. On the other hand, people from different backgrounds could get together and begin to form bonds, allowing for greater overall connections instead of just connections between a majority. 
  1. The author mentioned that Marrow chose to highlight White Americans, African Americans, Indian immigrants, and Mexican immigrants in his study. I wonder why other groups were not given this same “importance”. What about Asian immigrants, or immigrants from Eastern Europe? 
  1. Problem-solving skills are always going to be a big part of conducting research. Learning to look for and fix minor errors will help get the most valid data. While it may be difficult sometimes to tell if your data is truly valid, using multiple different methods from the textbook will help clarify that. 
  1. It is interesting how people from different fields of study view the world in different ways. Biologists might look at certain scientific concepts differently than chemists, and chemists might have different views from physicists or mathematicians. But at the end of the way, each of their points of view is considered equally right. 

Reflection #1

Conducting research, whether in the lab or out in the field, is not something that you can just dive right into. The complexity of experiments and all their variables is one factor that makes preparation a necessity in research studies. Add in ethics and the rules, and it makes sense how not just anybody could become a researcher. Many people starting off have no idea what criteria should be met. Thankfully many researchers have made different acronyms or memorable phrases to help ensure new researchers know what to look for in their early plans. One of them being EMRN: Engagement, Mechanics, Reasoning, and Novelty. 

Novelty, in this context, means coming up with an authentic plan that looks for deeper meanings in events. A great research study must come from an idea that is unique and significant to the subject matter. Conducting an experiment based on old ideas or unpopular ideas will not give people any reason to look at the results. This is most likely why many researchers would prefer to conduct fieldwork over lab experiments. Discoveries made on human patterns or interactions cannot always be found in a laboratory. Going out and talking to people is the best way to conduct a groundbreaking study. 

For the Mechanics part of the EMRN criteria, a researcher must make sure their plan is understandable and without fault. However, these “faults” can be from many different causes. For example, one of the biggest changes to research in the 21st century is implementing rules for ethics.  Which is good for not only the participants of research studies, but the researchers as well, since mistreating volunteers in a study could lead to a shift in the results. But what about the other people who are a part of the study, such as the testers? They are not mentioned a lot, but what if they did not have ethics protection? Those same errors from the participants could still happen with the testers. This is why researchers need to be thorough in looking for “faults” in their studies, because they could easily come from an unsuspected source. 

Doing research for the first time is not easy. There will be challenges the person must overcome. But there are always resources to help early researchers. I know this from personal experience, I am soon to be conducting research for the first time too. Luckily, I know exactly where to go if I get lost. 

Henrietta Lacks Top 5 Assignment

  • It is interesting how many people would disagree on whether or not the doctors were right to take samples from Henrietta Lack’s cancer cells without her permission. On one hand, the samples they took did allow them to further their cancer research, but on the other, they wrongfully took these samples from a dying woman who did not give them permission to do so. It is a debate between whether it is better to fulfill the last wishes of a dying person or fulfill the wishes of the living. It is a topic that I believe will never fully be agreed upon. 
  • What living through events such as the Black Lives Matter movement and the COVID-19 Pandemic has taught me is that resolutions to conflicts often come too late. For example, throughout the 1800’s, Native American tribes were forced to endure constant relocations and violent altercations from the American government. These people were separated from their homes and their families just because they did not fit in with the rest of the American population. A century later, most of these Natives are living in poverty-stricken reserves, unable to get themselves out. By that time, the US government had begun to reflect on how they treated the Native Americans in the past and attempted to bring the tribes back together, preserve their religions, and give them more control over their lives. But at this point, the damage was already done, the Native Americans could not return to the lives they had decades ago because of how much the American government had torn apart their culture. With the Black Lives Matter movement, it started when George Floyd was killed by the police officer Derek Chauvin. But this was not Chauvin’s only wrongful kill. He had actually received almost 20 complaints about the way he handled conflict as a police officer. It took him killing a person for people to finally realize that he should not be a cop. While he was later sentenced to 21 years in prison, the damage was already done, this one action ignited the whole country and nearly lead to the government defunding the police. 
  • The problem with society nowadays is that many people are so quick to highlight negativity and ignore the positive side. Several scientists who found out about what happened to Henrietta wanted to try and slow down or entirely eliminate research done with HeLa. However, Henrietta’s own relatives did not even think that this was the best route to take. Many of them, such as her grandson Alfred Lacks Carter, believed that the best approach would be to at least acknowledge the fact that none of this development in cancer treatment would have been possible without Henrietta Lacks. Alfred knew that despite the doctors being in the wrong for using Henrietta’s cells without her consent, what they did with those samples ultimately benefited tons of people.  
  • One question I have is how will the new policies on taking samples from people for research change the progression of medical advancements? If these rules did not exist beforehand, then it is safe to say that Henrietta Lacks was not the only case of ignoring consent. In fact, many of the medical advancements made in the mid 20th century could have been the result of this same issue. So, if we start enforcing a new policy on conducting research with proper consent, could this slow down future medical discoveries or is Henrietta’s case not as common as one might think? 
  • Many people believe that racism is a thing that will exist until the end of time. While in the past, racial prejudice majorly impacted the lives of minorities in the US, it is now less of a common problem. Despite that, the hard truth is that racism is still prevalent in America. It is still embedded in many professions and lines of work today. For example, racial prejudice from the police is still a massive problem in this country. Is it as bad as it was in the 1950’s? No, but it is still seen often. From George Floyd to Sonia Massey, the public is constantly being reminded of racism in the police force. The question is how can we stop this? In the case of Henrietta Lacks, how can we ensure that doctors will not try to bend the rules for someone simply because of the color of their skin? 

Introduction Top 5 Assignment

• In the beginning of the chapter, it is mentioned that following good research practices in a school setting does not always lead to conducting impactful research in the future. What is interesting about that is it shows that many students are missing a crucial part of the research process, a part that might be overlooked in a classroom setting.
• One thing that stands out to me about understanding methods of research is that most of the time, you must acknowledge that there are a lot of questions that you do not have the answer to. I could see how this could be difficult for many people who believe they know a lot more about a topic than they actually do.
• How can we best prepare for true field research? Since conducting actual research often involves making quick decisions and looking for solutions for any obstacles, what can we students do in order to best prepare for a fast-paced setting?
• It is interesting to me how passion is often a driver for good research. The introduction explained how most of the researchers who made appearances on the Give Methods a Chance podcast showed excitement and joy throughout the process.
• One question I have is how can students make themselves interested and engaged throughout a research study? How can we build a passion for research that could allow our results to be more impactful?

Making Change

Creating long-term transformations in our world has always been a problem, simply because our world is not the same all around. We all exist within smaller, complex systems that make up the entire planet. These systems often differ in many ways. This is what makes solving wicked problems so difficult, since coming up with a solution for one particular issue does not guarantee that it will work for that same issue all throughout the world. Leaving many people to assume that the fight for worldwide change is impossible. However, we often forget to look at the small similarities between the systems that govern our societies. As we do start to recognize these patterns, we begin to realize that large scale change is not as difficult as it may seem at first glance. 

Adrienne Marie Brown shows in the beginning sections of “Emergent Strategies” that the most crucial step in making changes in our world is by learning about natural systems. As explained in the introduction, we are often greatly affected by changes in other ecosystems around us and vice versa. If we want to make real changes that can benefit more than just one or two regions of the world, a basic understanding of the natural systems around us is a necessity. That means learning how to sustain our population and the population of other animals that share the planet with us. “I want to understand how we humans do that-how we earn a place on this precious planet, get in the ‘right relationship’ with it. So I am focusing on the ways creatures and ecosystems function together in and with the natural world” (5). Despite so many efforts being made to leave Earth behind in the future, we often forget to notice the perfect planet we already live on. The chances of life existing at all are slim, if this planet managed to get it right, then we should spend more time trying to heal it instead of abandoning it. 

The most intriguing part of Brown’s plans for understanding natural systems is the use of emergent strategies. The term emergent strategy is best explained by breaking down the meanings of the individual words. Emergent simply means looking at multiple different layers of interactions between systems. If two ecosystems were to be closely related based on similar patterns, this relationship could help people learn how to change or sustain one ecosystem by affecting the other. “But emergence shows us that adaptation and evolution depend more upon critical, deep, and authentic connections, a thread that can be tugged for support and resilience… Dare I say love. And we know how to connect-we long for it” (14). Strategies, on the other hand, refer to the steps taken to accomplish some sort of feat. Together, emergent strategies are measures made to change certain systems based on the relationships outside and within them. This is important because many patterns in nature are often ignored or not investigated because they may not have seemed so significant at first. However, Brown argues that these patterns could be the key to solving problems throughout multiple different systems, simplifying the way we look at complexity in the natural world. 

So what’s the point? Yes, these ideas are useful for people wanting to make changes in their communities, states, or even countries. But how does this apply to water equity and the Mississippi River? How can emergent strategies be used to solve problems along one of the largest rivers in the Americas? Well, despite how different certain communities along the Mississippi may be, they all share common advantages and disadvantages. Many of these cities experience massive flooding from the river, yet they also have access to easy transportation thanks to the river. In mapping the Mississippi, we can notice the similarities in nearby communities and use that to our advantage. For example, efforts made to minimize flooding in one city could also be used in another city with the same problem. Implementing Brown’s ideas in real life could be the key to changing our goals from just a vision to a reality. 

All in all, the systems in our world are a lot more connected than we may realize. Many different cities and states along the Mississippi River share common problems that can be solved by noticing the patterns within them. Even beyond our country, there are several massive rivers throughout the world that may pose the same problems for the people who live along them. Water equity along the Mississippi River is an issue in and of itself, but it is not the only water related issue that is faced in our world today. If we can learn to recognize the patterns within our vicinity, we can also learn to apply these solutions to other systems around the world, making real change not just for our country, but for our entire planet. 

« Older posts Newer posts »

© 2025 Jaiden DeBoe

Theme by Anders NorenUp ↑