Kasey Tipton

Menu
  • About Me
  • First Year
    • CODE120
      • Contract
    • CODE121
      • Contract
      • Class Portfolio
      • Class Portfolio
        • Class Portfolio
      • Content Assignment: Indigenous Knowledge
      • Indigenous Knowledge Final Video
      • Reflection #1
    • CODE 122
    • CODE 123
      • CODE 123 Grade Contract
        • Class Portfolio
        • Class Portfolio
  • Second Year
    • CODE 220
    • CODE 221
      • Class Portfolio
      • Class Portfolio Midterm
    • CODE 320
      • CODE320 ePortfolio
      • Spring 2025 Learning Contract
      • Contract
      • Contract
      • Coursework
      • Digital Project #1: The 610 Mile Jump 
      • Digital Project #2
      • DP #3
      • Final Lab
      • Grading Contract
      • Interview Reflection
      • Kasey Tipton’s Composition #1 
      • Kasey Tipton’s MC #2
      • Mixed Methods Lab
      • Reflection #1
      • Reflection #5
      • Reflection 4
      • Reflection: The Danger of a Single Story
      • UPDATED Class Portfolio
      • UPDATED Class Portfolio
      • UPDATED Class Portfolio
      • Updated Portfolio
  • My Journey
  • My Goals
Menu

Mixed Methods Lab

Kasey Tipton

April 11, 2024

Our group’s focus is on Indigenous knowledge within the Missouri Botanical Gardens. Our research question is, “How is Indigenous knowledge lacking within the garden?” Our priority is finding the gaps of Indigenous representation. We used  two mixed methods, interviews and surveys, in order to collect data. Our survey had received 7 responses and we interviewed 6 people. Doing the small focus groups helped us receive more nuanced explanatory data. However, I think surveys and interviews are both important in gathering data. 

Our survey responses left some blank areas within our data. Furthermore, not only did we only have 7 responses, but some people did not answer specific questions. With that being said, our interviews went a lot smoother. People were able to be descriptive and more thorough with their responses. It seemed easier to people to answer questions in person, rather than thinking about what to type on a survey. Along with this point, in the interviews, people seemed to think longer to answer the same questions. If our group could do this differently in the future, we would try to stick to the idea of larger focus groups (rather than two people at a time) because it improves our data when people can bounce ideas off of each other and add to what others say. 

The results of our data will help our group tremendously. It has shown us different areas that already include Indigenous knowledge. On the other hand, it has shown us areas of improvement. We can use this information to figure out how to portray Indigenous knowledge evenly throughout the garden. Our interviews overall had similar responses with the survey. For example, our question, “Where do you think Indigenous Knowledge belongs in the garden?” A lot of our responses said that it should be easily accessible in places that involve Indigenous knowledge. In another word, everywhere. One of the most important notes that was given was for us to help the garden improve on allowing for Indigenous knowledge to be important year round. Rather than celebrating it for a specific month/week. This point helped 

Using mixed methods on this topic was very important. It gave us multiple different viewpoints on these important topics. Even though our survey and interviews went very well, I think it would be important to hear about how the public feels about Indigenous knowledge. I would like to hear the perspectives of the garden visitors and if they have even heard of Indigenous knowledge within the garden. 

Recent Posts

  • Reflection #1
  • Final Lab
  • Lab Reflection 1/31
  • Kasey Tipton’s MC #2
  • Learning Contract

Recent Comments

No comments to show.

Archives

  • September 2024
  • April 2024
  • February 2024
  • October 2023
  • September 2023
  • July 2023

Categories

  • Uncategorized
© 2025 Kasey Tipton | Powered by Minimalist Blog WordPress Theme